China’s One Child Policy.

Posted in Uncategorized on March 29th, 2012 by Paul Carr — Be the first to comment!

China bashing is alive and well amongst Republican candidates for President.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/romney-chinas-onechild-policy-barbaric/910866/

Romney is saying that he’ll withdraw funding from the United Nations Population Fund.

But read this:

http://www.undispatch.com/unfpa-does-not-support-chinas-one-child-policy-unfpa-does-not-support-chinas-one-child-policy-unfpa-does-not-support-chinas-one-child-policy-unfpa-does-not-support-chinas-one-child-policy

Romney is disingenuously posturing.

Personally, I support the China one child policy. According to the Chinese government, since 1979, 400 million fewer people were born as a result of the policy. China would have a population of 1.75 billion today instead of 1.35 billion if there was no one child policy in place. The policy has been a huge success.

In 1979, the Chinese government faced a horrific choice. Its population was expanding rapidly and the country had just started to embrace capitalism and the free market. The Chinese government didn’t want to see slums develop, it didn’t want to see its healthcare, education and police services overstretched. It wanted to provide a minimum dignity floor for all its citizens. To do this, population growth had to be constrained.

The disadvantage of the one child policy was that it conspired with the cultural norm of developing world countries to prefer a son to a daughter. The result is that according to the 2010 Census, there are 118 baby boys to 100 baby girls. This has at least stabilized in recent years however. In India, the gender disparity is not as bad but it has been getting worse in recent years. This suggests to me that the cultural preference for boys is a very powerful force.

China faced a horrific choice in 1979 and chose the lesser of two evils. The result is no slums, low crime, a developing rule of law for all the population, high literacy, comprehensive schooling, basic healthcare for all and much more. It’s hard to measure this against what might have been had no one child policy been adopted. But, these are tangible results nonetheless. Another result is an ever greater gender gap between boys and girls. This is unfortunate and, as I say, the policy was the lesser of two evils.

It might well be dropped as early as 2015. Maybe 2020. It has almost done its job.

On the subject of the balance.

Posted in Uncategorized on February 10th, 2012 by Paul Carr — Be the first to comment!

I haven’t seen the documentary, Profiting From Prostitution, but I think providing a link to Ruhama’s website and giving their hotline number on the RTE website is biased. Ruhama consider all sex work to be a form of rape. Their outreach service gives out cups of tea and not condoms to sex workers. 2 of their trustees are religious orders that ran the Magdalene laundries. An investigation should be impartial.  For the sake of balance, RTE PrimeTime Investigates should also provide contact details for the Sex Workers Alliance of Ireland or the Turn Off the Blue Light campaign. Ruhama play a prominent role in the opposing Turn Off the Red Light campaign.  The Sex Workers Alliance of Ireland and TOBL campaign for the civil, human, labour, health and safety rights of all sex workers. They seek to empower sex workers by giving them rights. Ruhama want to take them away and shut down their industry, something that has been tried, incidentally, since the foundation of the state without success.

The RTE Primetime Investigates series falsely accused a Catholic missionary, Kevin Reynolds, of rape last year. 

We ought to legalize the sex work industry in the Republic of Ireland.

Posted in Uncategorized on February 9th, 2012 by Paul Carr — Be the first to comment!

It’s breathtaking! Look at the Magdalen laundries run by these very same religious orders who are now the trustees of the Ruhama and the Irish Immigration Council. Perhaps 30,000 women, many of them sex workers, were trafficked through their network. The last one was only shut down in 1996. Watch “Sinners”. In that film, we see that many of the so-called “fallen women” gave birth to their babies whilst in their Magdalene laundry prison. Then the babies were taken from them, often against their wishes. These babies were then given to “good Catholic families”.

We should learn from our own history, not import a zero-tolerance approach from Sweden. Incidentally, the Swedish Sex Purchase Act of 1999 was imported from the USA where, if I’m not mistaken, every US state (even Nevada, save for a few counties) bans the sale and purchase of sex as well as all other related activities. There have been “John Schools” in the USA since 1996 where men are “treated” for purchasing sex. 

People will say that the situation is different in Sweden to US states. In Sweden, they’ll say only the purchase of sex is criminalized but the sale of sex isn’t. This is a distinction without a difference. By criminalizing the purchase of sex, livelihood is removed from all sex workers. Many are driven more into the shadows particularly vulnerable migrant workers. They may be deported if they present themselves to the police. They are exposed to a higher risk of violence from customers and criminal gangs and are exposed to a higher risk of catching STIs. 

We need to adopt a harm reduction approach as is adopted in New Zealand. Let the sex workers unionize in the Republic of Ireland. Empower them. Give them their full human, civil, labour, legal, health and safety rights just as are given to all other workers. The Dutch and German approaches are flawed because their laws are crafted from the point of view of maintaining law and order. Instead, give street sex workers the right to solicit anywhere they like in the country. Allow brothels and smaller sex worker led cooperatives the right to set up anywhere in the country. Local authorities can then pass bylaws if they wish to regulate where the brothels and sex worker led and operated cooperatives can set up. Brothels will be subject to national registration and regulation requirements. 

Give sex workers the benefit of the doubt. Assume they are law-abiding citizens just like any other category of citizen unless proven otherwise on an individual case-by-case basis. The police’s default job is to protect them not prosecute them. Let the sex workers have access to the courts where they can take and receive cases in their own name.

Make it a criminal offense for a John to refuse to wear a condom. Load the legal dice in favour of the sex worker in order to deter any would-be ugly mug from raising his hand in violence and intimidation against a sex worker. Provide hot lines between brothels and sex worker owned and operated cooperatives and the local police station so that they can phone in complaints against violent customers. 

I am sure you have heard of Robert Pickton who for a number of years terrorized and murdered many vulnerable street workers and drug addicts in Vancouver. After he was finally caught, he bragged in prison that he killed 49 people. Sex workers who were physically abused by him but not murdered went to the police to complain about him. But because they were sex workers, their complaints were not taken seriously and Robert Pickton continued with his killing spree. In Canada, the situation relating to sex work is similar to the Republic of Ireland. The sale and purchase of sex is not prohibited but related surrounding activities are, such as soliciting, procuring, keeping a brothel or, bawdyhouse in Canada speak, and living off the avails of prostitution. 

We ought to fully decriminalize and legalize prostitution in the Republic of Ireland (but not legalize in the German or Dutch sense). We ought to legalize in the New Zealand sense. Sex work is a profession and so we give sex workers their full civil, health, safety, human and legal rights like are given to all other workers.

Sex work is not going to go away with the wave of a legislative wand. Time to regulate and tax where possible. It’s time to recognize the profession officially without necessarily approving of it as an profession open to everyone. We recognize it but not promote it. There is a difference. 

Frank Duff and his Legion of Mary successfully campaigned to shut down the Red light district of Monto in the 1920s. Ultimately, his zero tolerance and pseudo moral campaign didn’t work. Organized prostitution was removed but prostitution broadly was only driven underground. Organized prostitution re-emerged in the 1970s as the Republic of Ireland started to liberalize and open up particularly after our accession to the EEC.

Anyone who says that, with some amazing legislative sleight-of-hand prostitution can be wiped out, is an idiot. The Social Democratic party of Sweden that passed the Sex Purchase act in 1999 believed they could wipe out the sex industry. They were wrong. There was a renewed clampdown on the industry after 2008. Police stats between 2008 and 2010 show that across a broad category of sex related and trafficking related categories such as the purchase of sex with children and adults and trafficking for sexual and not sexual purposes there have been huge increases. 

Sweden is selling a fantasy of itself to the world. Most of the rest of the world won’t be taken in.

Michael Martin and Prostitution

Posted in Uncategorized on February 8th, 2012 by Paul Carr — Be the first to comment!

Michael Martin says that prostitution is a blight on society. 

http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/0208/prostitution.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

No surprises there. Fianna Fail is the party of zero tolerance. Look at abortion. We’re the only country in Europe with a population of over a million that still effectively bans abortion altogether. We’ve got Fianna Fail to thank for that. Every year over 4,000 Irish women (that we know of) pass judgment on the Fianna Fail solution to an Irish problem by travelling to England for an abortion. Enda Kenny’s response to Michael Martin was disappointing and indulging in Fianna Fail nonsense but, for now, I want to focus on what the Irish Government is seriously considering introducing to this jurisdiction.  

A Sweden style Sex Purchase act will not work here. Such an act is being considered for this jurisdiction. It basically involves the outlaw of the purchase of sex but not the sale. But even if only the purchase of sex was criminalized, this will still undermine the livelihood of sex workers by removing custom from them, by removing their source of income..  The law hasn’t worked in Sweden. The law was introduced in Sweden in 1999. Yet, the Swedish government ordered a renewed clampdown on sex purchase offenses and other sex related offenses in 2008. Police stats between 2008 and 2010 showed a dramatic increase in many categories of sex and trafficking related crime.

Zero tolerance doesn’t work here. What we need is a harm reduction approach. We should decriminalize prostitution like was done in New Zealand in 2003. Give sex workers their full labour, health, civil, human and safety rights just as are given to other workers. 

We have tried the zero tolerance approach since the foundation of the state. At that time, overt religious justification was given. Frank Duff and his Legion of Mary successfully campaigned to close down Monto red light district in the 1920s. 

We drove out organized prostitution and drove prostitution underground. We placed some prostitutes in Magdalene laundries where they were supposed to learn to be fine upstanding members of society. We didn’t eliminate prostitution. We just gave sex workers less protection. Organized prostitution made a comeback in the 1970s as a more liberal minded Republic of Ireland began scaling back on the moral police state.

The campaign against prostitution ultimately didn’t work in the 1920s. Why should it work now? All we are doing is adding an additional tier of criminality to the industry by outlawing the purchase of sex. Activities surrounding the transaction are already banned such as solicitation, keeping a brothel and living off the earnings of prostitution et cetera.

We need to learn from our own history and not import a badly designed Swedish so-called solution which is based on the so-called “radical feminist” ideology that all prostitution is rape.

There are no quick fixes to a complex social issue like this one. The last thing we should do is be judgmental and pass judgmental laws. Zero tolerance approaches are all about the quick fix – or as I like to term it, burying one’s head in the sand. 

Iran and Iraq.

Posted in Uncategorized on January 5th, 2012 by Paul Carr — Be the first to comment!

Iran had got Iraq written all over it. In 2003, we had the spectacle of George W Bush’s invasion of Iraq because Saddam Hussein allegedly had weapons of mass destruction or was developing such weapons which could be targeted against western countries such as the USA. 6 months after that invasion, it was confirmed that Iraq had no such programs of developing weapons of mass destruction, be they chemical, biological or nuclear. But, we all felt good about gettting rid of the tinpot dictator despite the fact that he posed no threat to us or even to the immediate region, despite the fact that by invading, George W Bush was breaking international law and was violating the core Nuremberg principles that US lawyers had set down to try Nazi officials including the ultimate war crime of initiating a war of aggression. But, we all wanted to get rid of that dark swarthy tinpot dictator so we, in the west, didn’t care. Fast forward to 2012, and the drumbeat of war is rolling against Iran. Why don’t those swarthy Islamics learn their lesson and live in permanant poverty and stupidity like we in the west want them to linger? Meanwhile, the 1% elite of the USA live a life of luxury whilst the plebs go to the colosseum to see the Ayatollah of Iran and his President be thrown to the lions. When will the 99% finally cotton on?

Fighting Injustice.

Posted in Uncategorized on January 2nd, 2012 by Paul Carr — Be the first to comment!

Fine Gael TD Olwyn Enright took at 130,000 euro lump sum and takes an annual pension of 22,000 euro a year after she retired from the Dail in her mid-30s. That is just plain WRONG.

I read thousands of Irish people are being put in prison for non payment of fines. The bankers, developers, the politicians, the privileged are above all that.

We must ask ourselves. Who are we as Irish people? What does it mean to be Irish? Don’t give me this guff that we don’t get an answer. We’re getting an answer. To be Irish means to reward the rich and to punish the poor. 

We are all entitled to redefine ourselves as Irish. Bankers, developers, politicians and the privileged, you dare stand in our way, we’ll roll right over you.

Happy New Year Everyone.

In defense of ex-Taoisigh’s expenses.

Posted in Uncategorized on January 2nd, 2012 by Paul Carr — Be the first to comment!

All Ex-Taoisigh deserve to keep all expenses. They deserve rich rewards for looking after those feckless and potentially troublesome gobshites called the Irish. Some of them are so lazy, they even emigrate. It must be tremendous burden running such a country. Surely some rewards after the years of selfless service need to be dangled in front of them in order to incentivize them to step forward and apply their talents in order to save the feckless Irish from themselves. Think of all the jobs they could have taken in the financial services sector where they would easily rake in millions a year with which to buy a decent palace and a stately car. We live in the real world. In the real world, we are the financial world’s poor cousin. Live with it. In the real world, people want more and more money. A decent wooden table costs 10,000 euros these days. It’s dog-eat-dog. The airport can be murder. Is it not too much to ask that room be made available in the parking lot on a permanent basis? Be reasonable people! 

Visiting the Dentist.

Posted in Uncategorized on December 30th, 2011 by Paul Carr — Be the first to comment!

Been loitering in Shenzhen for the past month. Was getting root canal on one of my second pre-molar maxillary teeth. Took 4 appointments. One a week. First two was cleaning out the pulp from inside the tooth as well as drilling away a lot of what remained of the tooth that hadn’t decayed. Third appointment was drilling and inserting the stick. Final one yesterday was the fitting of the bleedin’ crown, an enamel one which cost a fortune.

The lesson here is always look after your teeth. Brush at least twice a day. I would do three times but I’m too lazy. Do the flossing every night and use the mouthwash to flush your mouth after it’s all done. Get an electric toothbrush. Look after it.

Yeah, up to about 6 weeks ago, I was sadly neglecting my teeth. I’m not going to go into that horror show here but what I did was I went to a dentist in Hong Kong about 6 weeks ago to get a status report and also because I was suffering from some tooth pain and what she told me was that I needed 2 fillings and one root canal.

That came as a genuine surprise to me. I honestly thought more work would need to be done. I hadn’t been to a dentist for about 2 years and I was neglecting my teeth badly in that time. As I say, I am not going to go into that horror story.

The kindly and professional dentist did the two fillings for me in Hong Kong but I decided to have the root canal done in Shenzhen where I figured it would be cheaper. Well, it wasn’t really, so that’s another fiasco. It’s done and dusted now.

But, I am hopeful that my teeth are in better shape now. No more tooth pain like I had before. I postponed a trip to Kunming in China a few months ago because of the toothache. I have been taking care of my teeth for the past 6 weeks or so and I intend to keep that up. Dentists make a fortune from people like me, but hopefully “me” has changed.

Off to Guangzhou tomorrow.

Dear Mr Kenny, you must take a risk on investigative committees.

Posted in Uncategorized on November 11th, 2011 by Paul Carr — Be the first to comment!

Dear Enda Kenny, Taoiseach; Alan Shatter, Minister for Justice, and Government Party Colleagues.

I propose the following Constitutional amendment to Article 15, section 10.

Add the following 4 subsections.

Subsection 2. Members of the Oireachtas shall be representatives of the whole people and shall not bound by orders or instructions and shall be responsible only to their conscience.

Subsection 3. Dail Eireann shall have the power, on a motion of one quarter of its members, and Seanad Eireann shall have the power, on a motion of one half of its members, to inquire into any matter of general public importance.

Subsection 4. In the course of such inquiry the Houses may investigate any individual and make findings in relation to their conduct.

Subsection 5. The conduct of such inquiries shall be regulated by law. Such law shall balance the rights of the individual with the public interest in the effective investigation of matters of general public importance.

We need investigative committees with full investigative powers, Mr Kenny, including the power to compel attendance by affected persons as well as make findings of fact against both institutions and individuals. This was part of your mandate. You must take a risk. You must move. The greatest enemy of the Irish people has historically been stasis.

Also, in a previous email to you all, I made mention of the necessity to restore the original 1998 Referendum Act with one exception.

You can access that email here.

http://paulpcarr.net/?p=1052

Best Wishes,

Paul Carr

Sent from my iTouch

The original statutory functions of 1998 Referendum Act must be restored…with one alteration.

Posted in Uncategorized on November 11th, 2011 by Paul Carr — Be the first to comment!

Dear Enda Kenny, Taoiseach, Alan Shatter, Minister for Justice, and Government party colleagues,

The original 1998 Referendum Act should be restored, with one difference. No judges or former judges can serve on the commission. It’s plainly obvious that a former judge serving as chairman of the referendum commission has a conflict of interest when it comes to the issue raised by the 30th amendment proposal.

The statutory function of the referendum commission to present the pros and cons of a proposal as well as its remit to encourage debate amongst the citizenry must be restored as provided for in the original 1998 Referendum Act.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referendum_Commission

Best Wishes,

Paul Carr